In 1883, Johan Kjeldahl published “A new method for the determination of N in organic substances” that became one of the greatest achievements in science up to that time. Prior to the Kjeldahl method, also known as Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN), nitrogen was determined by time consuming combustion methods of Dumas, and of Will and Varentrapp. These methods required trained, expert chemists and were slow and very inconvenient. Only a few tests could be run per day. The new TKN method was faster, applicable to solids and liquids, and the data compared favorably to the combustion methods. Over the next 10 years following Kjeldahl’ s original publication, the method was improved by the addition of a metal catalyst and potassium sulfate salt that combined decreased the digestion time to about 0.5 – 2 hours per sample. The TKN method was standardized and remains virtually unchanged today. The TKN method obtains satisfactory results with almost all nitrogen compounds; however, recovery is incomplete with cyano-compounds, nitro-compounds, and certain alkaloids. Even with the addition of chemicals, such as salicylic acid, that aid in the recovery of samples with nitrate the recovery of TKN in samples with nitrate is usually low.
The TKN method presents problems to the modern high-throughput environmental laboratory attempting to analyze large numbers of samples for trace concentrations of total nitrogen. The TKN method requires a preliminary manual digestion with concentrated sulfuric acid, a metal catalyst, and potassium sulfate. Highest recoveries are obtained using a mercury catalyst but because of the toxicity of mercury many laboratories choose to use copper sulfate instead. The mercury catalyst resulted in a clear digest solution while the copper catalyst results in a green colored solution. The classical TKN procedure distilled ammonia nitrogen (the product of the digestion) separating the analyte from the matrix prior to analytical determination by titration or colorimetry. In a rapid analysis scheme, the added distillation step is very time consuming and severely limits laboratory throughput.
Miniaturized methods for the determination of TKN by semi-automated block digestion
followed by continuous flow colorimetric methods have been developed. These continuous flow methods omit the distillation step speeding the analysis, but suffer from difficulties that result from the color of the sample digest absorbing light at the analytical wavelength, improper matrix matching causing both positive and negative deflections of the baseline due to differences in refractive index between the sample solution and the carrier solution, and excess acid in the digestion solution causing reagents to precipitate with the continuous flow analyzer chemistry cartridge.
The Technicon Instruments Corporation, the manufacturer that developed the first continuous flow analyzer, developed a continuous digestion and analysis system that automatically digested and analyzed TKN. This apparatus/analyzer produced very good comparison data with manual TKN, however, it was never approved by the USEPA for compliance reporting and the instrument is no longer available commercially.
Many laboratories report detection limits as low as 0.01 mg/L by the TKN method, however, the United States Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory (USGS NWQL) in Denver Colorado reported that TKN data should not be reported below about 0.2 mg/L.
Ambient water criteria established for the State of Florida recommends maximum total nitrogen concentrations
ranging from 0.24 mg/L – 1 mg/L depending on water type and location. The USGS NWQL is a high throughput specialized laboratory that rarely receives samples from sources other than ambient rivers, streams and groundwater. Commercial laboratories that receive samples with highly polluted matrices will likely suffer higher than 0.2 mg/L N detection limits due to carryover and contamination of digestion vessels. Considering that the precision of measurement decreases (percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) increases) as the concentration approaches the detection limit, methods with lower detection limits than TKN are needed. A method is needed that measures total nitrogen directly, has a low enough detection limit for ambient water quality monitoring, a large dynamic range allowing analysis of clean and polluted samples in one batch, and does not experience a high degree of carryover (contamination) from sample to sample.